NEW JERSEY ASSEMBLY TAKES UP THE SUBJECT OF A PRIVATE CAUSE OF ACTION FOR BAD FAITH IN SETTLEMENT OF INSURANCE CLAIMS

Efforts have been made, since Hurricane Sandy, to broaden the remedies available to consumers who feel they have been wronged by the claim practices of insurance carriers. These efforts have failed in each of their prior versions. A-231 sponsored by Assemblypersons Reed Gusciora, Timothy Eustace, and Marlene Caride will be reviewed by the Assembly Financial Institutions and Insurance Committee on December 10, 2015. The bill has a narrow scope of relief, providing for a private civil action in addition to the enforcement authority of the Commissioner of Banking and Insurance only in regard to claims arising out of a declared disaster. In the event a carrier were to violate N.J.S.A. 17:29B-4(9) the wronged insured may recover the full amount of damages regardless of the coverage limits of the policy along with pre-judgment interest, attorneys’ fees, and all reasonable litigation expenses from the date of institution of the action as well as punitive damages.
THE STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS ARE ENUMERATED AS:
(9) Unfair claim settlement practices. Committing or performing with such frequency as to indicate a general business practice any of the following:
- (a) Misrepresenting pertinent facts or insurance policy provisions relating to coverages at issue;
- (b) Failing to acknowledge and act reasonably promptly upon communications with respect to claims arising under insurance policies;
- (c) Failing to adopt and implement reasonable standards for the prompt investigation of claims arising under insurance policies;
- (d) Refusing to pay claims without conducting a reasonable investigation based upon all available information;
- (e) Failing to affirm or deny coverage of claims within a reasonable time after proof of loss statements have been completed;
- (f) Not attempting in good faith to effectuate prompt, fair and equitable settlements of claims in which liability has become reasonably clear;
- (g) Compelling insureds to institute litigation to recover amounts due under an insurance policy by offering substantially less than the amounts ultimately recovered in actions brought by such insureds;
- (h) Attempting to settle a claim for less than the amount to which a reasonable man would have believed he was entitled by reference to written or printed advertising material accompanying or made part of an application;
- (i) Attempting to settle claims on the basis of an application which was altered without notice to, or knowledge or consent of the insured;
- (j) Making claims payments to insureds or beneficiaries not accompanied by a statement setting forth the coverage under which the payments are being made;
- (k) Making known to insureds or claimants a policy of appealing from arbitration awards in favor of insureds or claimants for the purpose of compelling them to accept settlements or compromises less than the amount awarded in arbitration;
- (l) Delaying the investigation or payment of claims by requiring an insured, claimant or the physician of either to submit a preliminary claim report and then requiring the subsequent submission of formal proof of loss forms, both of which submissions contain substantially the same information;
- (m) Failing to promptly settle claims, where liability has become reasonably clear, under one portion of the insurance policy coverage in order to influence settlements under other portions of the insurance policy coverage;
- (n) Failing to promptly provide a reasonable explanation of the basis in the insurance policy in relation to the facts or applicable law for denial of a claim or for the offer of a compromise settlement;
- (o) Requiring insureds or claimants to institute or prosecute complaints regarding motor vehicle violations in the municipal court as a condition of paying private passenger automobile insurance claims.
Contact CockerillCraigMoore Law
The attorneys of Craig, Annin & Baxter have testified before legislative committees on pending legislation and have participated in working groups with the Legislature in drafting legislation. If you wish to discuss this or any other pending legislative matter give us a call at 856-429-1060.
Should you worry about fractured skull injuries in the long term?
When involved in a crash, you face the possibility of injuries that can have short and long-term impacts on your health. Your head, neck and back are the most likely to suffer from these damages. In particular, head injuries often give cause for concern. If you end up...
Bicycle Riders – Governor Murphy Signed Safe Passing Requirements into Law
Between the pandemic, gas prices, and a desire for healthy exercise, bicycle traffic has increased in New Jersey and throughout the country. Now New Jersey has joined 42 other states in mandating that drivers give bicyclists more room when passing – or face penalties...
Egg Harbor crash kills two, injures two others
Most people in New Jersey take to the state's roads and highways expecting that the other motorists they encounter care as much about accident avoidance as they do. While that assumption often proves true, there are those instances where one encounters an...
Commercial vehicle accidents and operator fault
The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration mandates that commercial truck drivers use an electronic logging device. As noted by FreightWaves, instead of tracking their road hours on a paper log, an ELD records the information for drivers and stores it...
What are some sources of animal bite injuries?
Although some animals seem harmless at first, their bites may carry a variety of diseases and can even cause serious physical injury. Learning more about why these wounds make people ill or injured can help you understand what to do next. Disturbed resting areas...
What are signs of brain trauma?
After a shocking accident, you may notice signs of a worse issue happening with your brain and skull. Traumatic brain injuries can happen suddenly and affect every aspect of your life. Detecting the early signs of this problem will help you prevent further health...
What is premises liability?
You do not want to consider the prospect of an injury while out and about, but the reality is, there is always a chance. However, what makes an incident qualify under premises liability versus an unfortunate accident? Premises liability covers incidents that happen on...
5 of the Most Common Types of Cases to Appear in Civil Court
The civil court system is available to resolve conflicts between individuals, businesses and organizations. Craig Annin & Baxter’s Woodbury NJ civil law attorneys have expertise in helping their clients find the justice they deserve. Anyone considering legal...
APPELLATE DIVISION UPHOLDS MULTI-MILLION DOLLAR JUDGMENT IN MMA FIGHTER’S SHED RX CONTAMINATION CASE.
Cockerill, Craig & Moore, LLC partner Jeffrey S. Craig worked with Howard Jacobs to vindicate and obtain compensation for Yoel Romero whose rise in MMC rankings was detoured by contamination of a Gold Star supplement he took as part of his training regimen. Gold Star’s SHED RX product was contaminated with a banned substance causing Romero to fail a screening. Finding that Gold Star violated New Jersey’s Consumer Fraud Act a trial court awarded a multi-million dollar judgment. The Appellate Division reviewed the judgment and upheld the trial court in part, modified one aspect of the judgment, and remanded a third category of damages for further consideration. The modified award now totals $12,450,000 with the potential for that to be increased to compensate Romero for harm to his reputation. Yoel Romero v. Gold Star Distribution, LLC d/b/a Gold Star Performance Products, A-0379-20 New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division decided June 24, 2020.
What leads to a slip and fall injury?
Not only can slip and fall injuries leave you with severe head and spine complications, but you can also struggle to know who was at fault. Knowing how these incidents happen is important for anyone struggling to recover after a fall. Unsafe conditions According to...

