HOW IS THE APPLICATION OF THE “BASEBALL RULE” AFFECTED BY THE EXPANSION OF NETTING IN MAJOR LEAGUE BALLPARKS?
Major League Baseball this past off-season issued a recommendation that all teams lengthen the safety netting at ballparks to increase fan safety. http://m.mlb.com/news/article/159233076/mlb-issues-recommendations-on-netting. Tampa Bay was one of the teams that heeded the new recommendations; “I don’t think we’re taking anything away from the fans who are there,” said Rays vice president of operations/facilities Rick Nafe. “My own personal observation — I have sat in seats in that area that are unprotected by a net, and I tend to enjoy the game a lot more when I know there’s a net in front of me. You know, some of those seats you have to pay attention constantly. That’s just a personal opinion. But I don’t think we’re going to be taking anything away from the fans.” http://m.mlb.com/news/article/159233076/mlb-issues-recommendations-on-netting.
Despite their best intentions, a Rays fan was struck and seriously injured by a baseball fouled by a Rays player that passed through the protective netting and struck her in the face. http://abcnews.go.com/Sports/fan-rays-game-struck-foul-ball-protective-netting/story?id=38442152
Apparently, at the bottom of the seam where the new netting joined the old, triangular gaps were left to provide access to the camera wells. The gaps angled sideways from the field, and the width of the opening facing the field was no more than 6 inches, which made it seemingly unlikely for a ball to get through. http://www.tampabay.com/news/fan-struck-by-foul-ball-is-in-the-hospital-rays-add-netting-to-close-gap/2273551 The Rays have already taken steps to close off those gaps, and the injured fan is recovering from facial injuries that required surgery.
The “Baseball Rule” has long protected baseball teams, as well as hockey teams and other sports from lawsuits for injuries suffered by fans when they are struck by projectiles that leave the field of play or rink. It is a specialized negligence rule that has been in effect since the early twentieth-century. Patrons who chose unprotected seating areas were routinely denied recovery. Such decisions based their decisions on two facts: that the danger of errant balls was common knowledge and that spectators sitting in unscreened seats assumed the risk of injury. See, e.g., Brisson v. Minneapolis Baseball & Athletic Ass’n, 185 Minn. 507, 240 N.W. 903 (1932); Kavafian v. Seattle Baseball Ass’n, 107 Wash. 249, 181 P. 677 (1919). Thus, the rule established a fact-specific standard of care for injuries caused by errant balls at baseball stadiums by accounting for the open and obvious nature of the risk that batted balls pose to fans. Maisonave v. Newark Bears Prof’l Baseball Club, Inc., 185 N.J. 70, 78 (2005).
NEW JERSEY AND THE BASEBALL RULE
In New Jersey and several other states, the operator of a sports venue must provide protected seating “sufficient for those spectators who may be reasonably anticipated to desire protected seats on an ordinary occasion,” and second, the operator must provide protection for spectators in “the most dangerous section” of the stands. The second component of this limited duty may ordinarily be satisfied by the operator providing screened seats behind home plate in baseball and behind the goals in hockey. New Jersey follows a hybrid approach, patrons in the seating areas of a stadium are subject to the limited duty “Baseball Rule”, while those in other areas of the venue are protected by the business invitee rule, which provides that a landowner “owe[s] a duty of reasonable care to guard against any dangerous conditions on his or her property that the owner either knows about or should have discovered.” Maisonave v. Newark Bears Prof’l Baseball Club, Inc., 185 N.J. 70, 85 (2005) Where the operator of a stadium provides screened seats for the members of the public that desire such protection, and the protection fails, is the operator liable for the injuries that result? The answer is determined by the particular facts of the incident. A Florida jury may have to determine whether leaving the triangular gap described in Marc Topkin’s story for the Tampa Bay Times constituted a failure by the Rays to take reasonable care to protect their patrons. If this happened in New Jersey and you were a juror – what would you decide?
Contact CockerillCraigMoore Law
If you have a concern about your legal rights, remedies, and obligations contact the experienced lawyers of Craig Annin & Baxter, LLP.
What is the average cost of an SCI?
Spinal cord injuries are serious no matter how minor the damage. The effects of one range from numbness and tingling at the extremities all the way to full-body paralysis. This severity requires rapid attention, which may result in costly surgeries, long hospital...
Know how to handle the aftermath of a car crash
Getting into a collision is often a disorienting experience. However, there are several steps that people need to take after the accident. Even a minor collision can result in injuries. According to Nerd Wallet, drivers should ask if any of their passengers incurred...
What should I do after a dog bite?
Dogs can add much love and enjoyment to a person's life. However, when a dog is dangerous or the owner lacks responsibility, a dog can also cause major injuries. These injuries often require medical attention to prevent more serious effects. The Cleveland Clinic...
LESSON TWO: DOES AN SIU REFERRAL TRIGGER A LITIGATION HOLD – WHY IT SHOULD
See Lesson One HERE I like thunder; I don’t know why so many people fear it. After many hours on weekends, after school, and summer days and evenings lugging golf clubs as a caddy – they had metal shafts and heads back then – I came to appreciate thunder as a...
Casino Lending: Following the Rules Gives Harrah’s a Win
In the heavily regulated casino industry following the magnitude of rules often seems like a burden that increases costs and gets in the way. But Harrah’s was rewarded with an important win on Friday when the New Jersey Appellate Division, the intermediate appellate...
Why You Should Examine Your Will Before a Divorce
When you are getting divorced, you will probably have to deal with how to divide your property when your divorce ends. You should also think about how your property might be distributed if you die before your divorce is finished or if you fail to change the provisions...
Everything You Need to Know about Boating Accident Claims
People go out on the water to relax and have fun. Unfortunately, a good time can easily turn bad when dangerous conditions are in place. If you’ve been in a boating accident, an experienced NJ attorney can help you navigate the waters ahead. Common Causes of Boating...
Believe You Lost Your Job because you Filed a Complaint against your employer? What to do next
If your employer has unlawfully fired you, you have the right to file a wrongful termination lawsuit. This lawsuit can help you recoup money or receive unemployment benefits while you look for a new job. Our Woodbury employment attorneys can help you navigate the...
How Long Does a Workplace Discrimination Case Take?
If you are the victim of discrimination at work and want to take legal action, you are probably wondering how long the case will take. Workplace discrimination cases take an average of two to three years to complete and offer a resolution. This short post talks about...
Who Is Responsible for a Trucking Accident Injury?
Getting into a trucking accident is a stressful experience, and you have many things about which to think. You are likely asking yourself how to decide who is at fault when an accident takes place. In most cases, the insurance companies go with anything law...