THREE THINGS GOVERNER CHRISTIE AND THE STATE LEGISLATURE CAN DO TO REDUCE THE EXPENSE OF STATE EMPLOYEE HEALTH COVERAGE

Three things Governor Christie and the state legislature can do to reduce the expense of state employee health coverage, without compromising the quality of health care provided, include the following:
- Amend the Insurance Fraud Prevention Act; N.J.S.A. 17:33A-1 et seq. (“IFPA”) to apply to the State Health Benefits Plan. Do you know that the State’s strongest weapon against fraudulent insurance claims isn’t available to protect the State’s own Health Benefit Plan? Because the Insurance Fraud Prevention Act applies only to insured claims – not those which are self-insured – the State of New Jersey and other large entities that self-insure for health benefits can’t benefit from its provisions. Individuals or entities that cheat the State Health Benefits Plan aren’t subject to the statutory treble damages and attorneys’ fees sanctions that deter these cheaters or at least take away the financial incentive to engage in such conduct.
- Require all services in an In-Network Hospital be compensated on an In-Network basis. You may not realize it but even if you go to an In-Network hospital for care – without being informed – some of your care may be provided by consultants who are Out-Of Network providers. The providers may bill at a higher rate for their time than they would if they were In-Network, potentially costing the patient and the State Health Benefits Plan thousands of dollars for care an In-Network consultant, sometimes from the same practice, would have provided for a fraction of the cost. In-Network hospitals and providers benefit from the steering that takes place when a patient / insured chooses a In-Network provider, this steering is accomplished through reduced cost-sharing obligations for patients who chose In-Network providers. When all of the providers are In-Network this arrangement achieves its intended result; quality, cost-controlled care. When Out-Of-Network contractors provide care in an In-Network facility they piggy-back on the In-Network status of the facility without the limitations of In-Network status for themselves. These providers are often not chosen by the patient but are assigned rotationally by the hospital or by referral from another provider and the patient is not informed the provider is Out-Of-Network or what his or her charges will be. Because of the high percentage of reimbursement for Out-of-Network care provided by the State Health Benefits Plan it is an attractive target for those who would exploit this opportunity for their own benefit.
- Limit Out-Of-Network benefits to those instances where a genuine need for the expertise of a particular individual provider or facility is necessary. New Jersey has a bountiful supply of talented medical providers and top notch health care facilities throughout the state, and most of them belong to the patient care networks available to enrollees in the State Health Benefits Plan. While no accident or illness is routine when it is your own or that of someone you love, most injuries or illnesses can be treated by the able professionals and facilities in your local care networks. The New Jersey State Health Benefits Plan is among the most generous when it comes to Out-Of-Network Benefits and Out-Of-Network care is a significant aspect of the health care expenses paid. (Stellar providers in bordering states like New York and Pennsylvania are also members of the available patient care networks.)
Contact CockerillCraigMoore Law
At CockerillCraigMoore Law, all of our lawyers have decades of courtroom experience. Three of our partners are certified as civil trial attorneys by the New Jersey Supreme Court, and two are fellows of the American College of Trial Lawyers. To learn more about the services we provide to insurance carriers, contact our office online or call us at 856-429-1060 for an appointment.
NON-DISCLOSURE PROVISIONS IN AUTO SALES, LEASING, AND REPAIR CONTRACTS BANNED
NON-DISCLOSURE PROVISIONS IN AUTO SALES, LEASING, AND REPAIR CONTRACTS BANNED A non-disclosure bill, A-4044, passed both houses of the New Jersey Legislature and was signed into law by Governor Christie in a late flurry of legislation before Governor Christie left...
New Jersey Supreme Court Updates Standards For Communicating Rejection of Real Estate Contract After Attorney Review
On April 3, 2017 the New Jersey Supreme Court published its decision in Michael Conley, Jr. v. Mona Guerrero (A-65-15) (076928) dealing with the requirement of notice of rejection under the attorney review provisions of a standard form real estate contract. The...
DO WE REALLY NEED THE PROPOSED NEW “DISTRACTED DRIVING” PROVISION AND IS IT LIKELY TO BE “VOID FOR VAGUENESS”?
A proposed addition to New Jersey’s distracted driving statute, N.J.S.A. 39:4-97.3 would add this language; “[a]n operator of a moving motor vehicle shall not engage in any activity unrelated to the actual operation of a motor vehicle in a manner that interferes with...
HOW IS THE APPLICATION OF THE “BASEBALL RULE” AFFECTED BY THE EXPANSION OF NETTING IN MAJOR LEAGUE BALLPARKS?
Major League Baseball this past off-season issued a recommendation that all teams lengthen the safety netting at ballparks to increase fan safety. http://m.mlb.com/news/article/159233076/mlb-issues-recommendations-on-netting. Tampa Bay was one of the teams that...
ANTHEM OF THE SEAS PASSENGERS PLACED AT RISK BY ROYAL CARIBBEAN
By: Timothy E. Annin Royal Caribbean’s ANTHEM OF THE SEAS encountered hurricane strength winds and high seas resulting in her aborting a Caribbean cruise and returning to New Jersey this week. This is the second sailing in less than five months where a vessel set out...
NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT CONFIRMS INSURANCE FRAUD LAW DOES NOT REQUIRE THAT THE CARRIER BE INDUCED BY A FALSE STATEMENT TO PAY A DAMAGE CLAIM.
In a unanimous opinion released today the New Jersey Supreme Court held that a violation of the criminal insurance fraud statute, N.J.S.A. 2C:21-4.6(a), does not require proof that a false statement made by the defendant induced the insurance carrier to pay the claim....
NEW JERSEY ASSEMBLY TAKES UP THE SUBJECT OF A PRIVATE CAUSE OF ACTION FOR BAD FAITH IN SETTLEMENT OF INSURANCE CLAIMS
Efforts have been made, since Hurricane Sandy, to broaden the remedies available to consumers who feel they have been wronged by the claim practices of insurance carriers. These efforts have failed in each of their prior versions. A-231 sponsored by Assemblypersons...
WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM JUDGE BERMAN’S OPINION IN DEFLATEGATE ABOUT ATTACKS ON ARBITRATOR’S RULINGS?
DEFLATEGATE RULING – USDC JUDGE RULES ON NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE MANAGEMENT COUNCIL V. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE PLAYERS ASSOCIATION United States District Court Judge Richard M. Berman ruled today that the arbitrator’s ruling by Commissioner Goodell in National...
INSURANCE FRAUD – NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT UPDATES CARRIER RESPONSIBILITY
INSURANCE FRAUD – NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT UPDATES CARRIER RESPONSIBILITY TO INNOCENT THIRD PARTIES WHEN AN APPLICANT FOR A “BASIC” POLICY COMMITS APPLICATION FRAUD New Jersey’s courts have a history of protecting innocent third parties injured in accidents with...
CIVIL INSURANCE FRAUD DEFENDANTS NOW ENTITLED TO TRIAL BY JURY
In Allstate New Jersey Insurance Co. v. Gregorio Lajara (A-70-13) (073511) (Decided July 16, 2015) the New Jersey Supreme Court ruled yesterday that actions by insurance carriers under New Jersey’s Insurance Fraud Prevention Act, N.J.S.A. 17:33A-1 to 30 have now...

