HOW IS THE APPLICATION OF THE “BASEBALL RULE” AFFECTED BY THE EXPANSION OF NETTING IN MAJOR LEAGUE BALLPARKS?
Major League Baseball this past off-season issued a recommendation that all teams lengthen the safety netting at ballparks to increase fan safety. http://m.mlb.com/news/article/159233076/mlb-issues-recommendations-on-netting. Tampa Bay was one of the teams that heeded the new recommendations; “I don’t think we’re taking anything away from the fans who are there,” said Rays vice president of operations/facilities Rick Nafe. “My own personal observation — I have sat in seats in that area that are unprotected by a net, and I tend to enjoy the game a lot more when I know there’s a net in front of me. You know, some of those seats you have to pay attention constantly. That’s just a personal opinion. But I don’t think we’re going to be taking anything away from the fans.” http://m.mlb.com/news/article/159233076/mlb-issues-recommendations-on-netting.
Despite their best intentions, a Rays fan was struck and seriously injured by a baseball fouled by a Rays player that passed through the protective netting and struck her in the face. http://abcnews.go.com/Sports/fan-rays-game-struck-foul-ball-protective-netting/story?id=38442152
Apparently, at the bottom of the seam where the new netting joined the old, triangular gaps were left to provide access to the camera wells. The gaps angled sideways from the field, and the width of the opening facing the field was no more than 6 inches, which made it seemingly unlikely for a ball to get through. http://www.tampabay.com/news/fan-struck-by-foul-ball-is-in-the-hospital-rays-add-netting-to-close-gap/2273551 The Rays have already taken steps to close off those gaps, and the injured fan is recovering from facial injuries that required surgery.
The “Baseball Rule” has long protected baseball teams, as well as hockey teams and other sports from lawsuits for injuries suffered by fans when they are struck by projectiles that leave the field of play or rink. It is a specialized negligence rule that has been in effect since the early twentieth-century. Patrons who chose unprotected seating areas were routinely denied recovery. Such decisions based their decisions on two facts: that the danger of errant balls was common knowledge and that spectators sitting in unscreened seats assumed the risk of injury. See, e.g., Brisson v. Minneapolis Baseball & Athletic Ass’n, 185 Minn. 507, 240 N.W. 903 (1932); Kavafian v. Seattle Baseball Ass’n, 107 Wash. 249, 181 P. 677 (1919). Thus, the rule established a fact-specific standard of care for injuries caused by errant balls at baseball stadiums by accounting for the open and obvious nature of the risk that batted balls pose to fans. Maisonave v. Newark Bears Prof’l Baseball Club, Inc., 185 N.J. 70, 78 (2005).
NEW JERSEY AND THE BASEBALL RULE
In New Jersey and several other states, the operator of a sports venue must provide protected seating “sufficient for those spectators who may be reasonably anticipated to desire protected seats on an ordinary occasion,” and second, the operator must provide protection for spectators in “the most dangerous section” of the stands. The second component of this limited duty may ordinarily be satisfied by the operator providing screened seats behind home plate in baseball and behind the goals in hockey. New Jersey follows a hybrid approach, patrons in the seating areas of a stadium are subject to the limited duty “Baseball Rule”, while those in other areas of the venue are protected by the business invitee rule, which provides that a landowner “owe[s] a duty of reasonable care to guard against any dangerous conditions on his or her property that the owner either knows about or should have discovered.” Maisonave v. Newark Bears Prof’l Baseball Club, Inc., 185 N.J. 70, 85 (2005) Where the operator of a stadium provides screened seats for the members of the public that desire such protection, and the protection fails, is the operator liable for the injuries that result? The answer is determined by the particular facts of the incident. A Florida jury may have to determine whether leaving the triangular gap described in Marc Topkin’s story for the Tampa Bay Times constituted a failure by the Rays to take reasonable care to protect their patrons. If this happened in New Jersey and you were a juror – what would you decide?
Contact CockerillCraigMoore Law
If you have a concern about your legal rights, remedies, and obligations contact the experienced lawyers of Craig Annin & Baxter, LLP.
How to handle the mortgage in a New Jersey divorce
When you and your New Jersey spouse take out a mortgage together, both of you maintain responsibility for that mortgage even if you divorce, unless you make other arrangements. Even if your divorce decree dictates that only you or only your ex has to pay the mortgage,...
Divorcing with pets: who gets custody of the dog?
When you acquire a dog during your marriage, the pup becomes part of the family. You and your spouse may consider your pet another child between you. Unfortunately, unless you live in Illinois, Alaska or California, the law looks at your dog as property — this is true...
Parental teamwork paves the way to a workable child custody plan
Divorce may be on the horizon, but you and your spouse may still have children to raise, children who must adjust to the breakup of the family unit. You will need guidelines to help you manage your new role as co-parents, and teamwork is a good way to go about...
Are electric vehicles too quiet to be safe?
Because of designated sidewalks and mandatory yield signs, many parts of New Jersey are walkable for pedestrians. Still, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 175 pedestrians died in motor vehicle accidents in the Garden State in 2019 alone....
Could mediation be the best divorce option for the two of you?
If you and your spouse have decided to end your marriage, you may dread the thought of a lengthy divorce in court. Mediation is another option that many divorcing couples prefer because of its advantages over litigation. What can you expect to happen if you choose...
Don’t Google or Waze and Drive – Navigation by Cell Phone Can get you Ticketed
New Jersey’s Appellate Division released a published decision yesterday ruling that a driver’s use of his cell phone to type in the address for directions to his destination while driving constitutes the use of the phone prohibited by N.J.S.A. 34:97-3. This section of...
Drawing attention to other distracted driving risk factors
Behind the wheel, you need to avoid any distractions that could affect your driving. Many drivers understand that cell phones play a major role in the prevalence of distracted driving, such as texting, sending emails and making calls. However, many there are many...
NIL’S ARE NOT ONLY FOR COLLEGE STARS – NEW JERSEY PERMITS HIGH SCHOOL NIL’S
In response to a question raised through family members about what parents need to know -- and do -- in response to a NIL offer to their 16-year-old multi-sport star, I did a bit of research. Here is what I learned. NIL’s stand for Name Image and Likeness, you may...
Can a dog attack lead to sepsis?
Even if you trust your own dog implicitly, you know how unpredictable and dangerous other animals can be. In fact, a seemingly friendly dog may turn vicious with little notice or no notice at all. If a dog attacks you, you are vulnerable to a variety of injuries,...
How can doctors treat animal bites?
Animal bites can happen to anyone. Bites may occur with familiar animals, family pets or stranger animals at a campsite or hiking trails. According to Healthline, most people suffer animal bites because of a family pet. While some animal bites may result in mild...