HOW IS THE APPLICATION OF THE “BASEBALL RULE” AFFECTED BY THE EXPANSION OF NETTING IN MAJOR LEAGUE BALLPARKS?
Major League Baseball this past off-season issued a recommendation that all teams lengthen the safety netting at ballparks to increase fan safety. http://m.mlb.com/news/article/159233076/mlb-issues-recommendations-on-netting. Tampa Bay was one of the teams that heeded the new recommendations; “I don’t think we’re taking anything away from the fans who are there,” said Rays vice president of operations/facilities Rick Nafe. “My own personal observation — I have sat in seats in that area that are unprotected by a net, and I tend to enjoy the game a lot more when I know there’s a net in front of me. You know, some of those seats you have to pay attention constantly. That’s just a personal opinion. But I don’t think we’re going to be taking anything away from the fans.” http://m.mlb.com/news/article/159233076/mlb-issues-recommendations-on-netting.
Despite their best intentions, a Rays fan was struck and seriously injured by a baseball fouled by a Rays player that passed through the protective netting and struck her in the face. http://abcnews.go.com/Sports/fan-rays-game-struck-foul-ball-protective-netting/story?id=38442152
Apparently, at the bottom of the seam where the new netting joined the old, triangular gaps were left to provide access to the camera wells. The gaps angled sideways from the field, and the width of the opening facing the field was no more than 6 inches, which made it seemingly unlikely for a ball to get through. http://www.tampabay.com/news/fan-struck-by-foul-ball-is-in-the-hospital-rays-add-netting-to-close-gap/2273551 The Rays have already taken steps to close off those gaps, and the injured fan is recovering from facial injuries that required surgery.
The “Baseball Rule” has long protected baseball teams, as well as hockey teams and other sports from lawsuits for injuries suffered by fans when they are struck by projectiles that leave the field of play or rink. It is a specialized negligence rule that has been in effect since the early twentieth-century. Patrons who chose unprotected seating areas were routinely denied recovery. Such decisions based their decisions on two facts: that the danger of errant balls was common knowledge and that spectators sitting in unscreened seats assumed the risk of injury. See, e.g., Brisson v. Minneapolis Baseball & Athletic Ass’n, 185 Minn. 507, 240 N.W. 903 (1932); Kavafian v. Seattle Baseball Ass’n, 107 Wash. 249, 181 P. 677 (1919). Thus, the rule established a fact-specific standard of care for injuries caused by errant balls at baseball stadiums by accounting for the open and obvious nature of the risk that batted balls pose to fans. Maisonave v. Newark Bears Prof’l Baseball Club, Inc., 185 N.J. 70, 78 (2005).
NEW JERSEY AND THE BASEBALL RULE
In New Jersey and several other states, the operator of a sports venue must provide protected seating “sufficient for those spectators who may be reasonably anticipated to desire protected seats on an ordinary occasion,” and second, the operator must provide protection for spectators in “the most dangerous section” of the stands. The second component of this limited duty may ordinarily be satisfied by the operator providing screened seats behind home plate in baseball and behind the goals in hockey. New Jersey follows a hybrid approach, patrons in the seating areas of a stadium are subject to the limited duty “Baseball Rule”, while those in other areas of the venue are protected by the business invitee rule, which provides that a landowner “owe[s] a duty of reasonable care to guard against any dangerous conditions on his or her property that the owner either knows about or should have discovered.” Maisonave v. Newark Bears Prof’l Baseball Club, Inc., 185 N.J. 70, 85 (2005) Where the operator of a stadium provides screened seats for the members of the public that desire such protection, and the protection fails, is the operator liable for the injuries that result? The answer is determined by the particular facts of the incident. A Florida jury may have to determine whether leaving the triangular gap described in Marc Topkin’s story for the Tampa Bay Times constituted a failure by the Rays to take reasonable care to protect their patrons. If this happened in New Jersey and you were a juror – what would you decide?
Contact CockerillCraigMoore Law
If you have a concern about your legal rights, remedies, and obligations contact the experienced lawyers of Craig Annin & Baxter, LLP.
CASE NOTES – COMMENTARY ON NEW DECISIONS
There is a newly published case in New Jersey reversing a summary judgment granted to the dram shop defendant where the trial court erred in holding that the absence of eyewitness testimony that the driver was served while visibly intoxicated was fatal to the dram...
NEW JERSEY CONTEMPLATES AN ADDITIONAL CAUSE OF ACTION FOR CLAIMANTS SUBJECTED TO UNFAIR CLAIM PRACTICES
The tens of thousands of property and casualty claims related to Sandy’s wrath, along with the thousands of complaints state regulators, legislators, and the Governor’s office have received from frustrated claimants, have resulted in proposed legislation and...
FACTORS TO CONSIDER WHEN CHOOSING YOUR OWN HEALTH INSURANCE
WHAT TO LOOK FOR WHEN BUYING YOUR OWN HEALTH INSURANCE If you are self-employed or do not have health insurance coverage through your employer, you may be uncertain exactly what you need to consider when shopping for health insurance. Here are the key factors to look...
STRENGTHENING THE SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS UNIT – OUTSIDE COUNSEL PART I
PARTNERSHIP – INCREASING EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS The standard model of the Special Investigation Unit (“SIU”)/Outside Counsel partnership is what you could describe as the box model; the investigators for the SIU unit do their investigation and prepare their case...
FEDERAL ANTI – FRAUD EFFORTS GET ADDED ATTENTION
U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder followed up on President Obama’s tough stance on health care fraud on the campaign trail with news of a new enforcement action in which 91 defendants – including doctors, nurses, and hospital officials – were charged in health care...
THREE THINGS GOVERNER CHRISTIE AND THE STATE LEGISLATURE CAN DO TO REDUCE THE EXPENSE OF STATE EMPLOYEE HEALTH COVERAGE
Three things Governor Christie and the state legislature can do to reduce the expense of state employee health coverage, without compromising the quality of health care provided, include the following: Amend the Insurance Fraud Prevention Act; N.J.S.A. 17:33A-1 et...
TRIAL ATTORNEYS IN HADDONFIELD, NEW JERSEY
When you have unresolved legal problems, you want a legal team that will carefully review the facts and circumstances of your case and help you understand all your options. You also want lawyers who will listen closely to determine your individualized objectives, who...
HADDONFIELD CIVIL LITIGATION ATTORNEYS
If you need representation or advice in a civil matter or municipal court traffic matter it is imperative you move quickly to retain responsive, skilled and assertive lawyers to protect your interests. The trial process can be complex and daunting. You want attorneys...