HOW IS THE APPLICATION OF THE “BASEBALL RULE” AFFECTED BY THE EXPANSION OF NETTING IN MAJOR LEAGUE BALLPARKS?
Major League Baseball this past off-season issued a recommendation that all teams lengthen the safety netting at ballparks to increase fan safety. http://m.mlb.com/news/article/159233076/mlb-issues-recommendations-on-netting. Tampa Bay was one of the teams that heeded the new recommendations; “I don’t think we’re taking anything away from the fans who are there,” said Rays vice president of operations/facilities Rick Nafe. “My own personal observation — I have sat in seats in that area that are unprotected by a net, and I tend to enjoy the game a lot more when I know there’s a net in front of me. You know, some of those seats you have to pay attention constantly. That’s just a personal opinion. But I don’t think we’re going to be taking anything away from the fans.” http://m.mlb.com/news/article/159233076/mlb-issues-recommendations-on-netting.
Despite their best intentions, a Rays fan was struck and seriously injured by a baseball fouled by a Rays player that passed through the protective netting and struck her in the face. http://abcnews.go.com/Sports/fan-rays-game-struck-foul-ball-protective-netting/story?id=38442152
Apparently, at the bottom of the seam where the new netting joined the old, triangular gaps were left to provide access to the camera wells. The gaps angled sideways from the field, and the width of the opening facing the field was no more than 6 inches, which made it seemingly unlikely for a ball to get through. http://www.tampabay.com/news/fan-struck-by-foul-ball-is-in-the-hospital-rays-add-netting-to-close-gap/2273551 The Rays have already taken steps to close off those gaps, and the injured fan is recovering from facial injuries that required surgery.
The “Baseball Rule” has long protected baseball teams, as well as hockey teams and other sports from lawsuits for injuries suffered by fans when they are struck by projectiles that leave the field of play or rink. It is a specialized negligence rule that has been in effect since the early twentieth-century. Patrons who chose unprotected seating areas were routinely denied recovery. Such decisions based their decisions on two facts: that the danger of errant balls was common knowledge and that spectators sitting in unscreened seats assumed the risk of injury. See, e.g., Brisson v. Minneapolis Baseball & Athletic Ass’n, 185 Minn. 507, 240 N.W. 903 (1932); Kavafian v. Seattle Baseball Ass’n, 107 Wash. 249, 181 P. 677 (1919). Thus, the rule established a fact-specific standard of care for injuries caused by errant balls at baseball stadiums by accounting for the open and obvious nature of the risk that batted balls pose to fans. Maisonave v. Newark Bears Prof’l Baseball Club, Inc., 185 N.J. 70, 78 (2005).
NEW JERSEY AND THE BASEBALL RULE
In New Jersey and several other states, the operator of a sports venue must provide protected seating “sufficient for those spectators who may be reasonably anticipated to desire protected seats on an ordinary occasion,” and second, the operator must provide protection for spectators in “the most dangerous section” of the stands. The second component of this limited duty may ordinarily be satisfied by the operator providing screened seats behind home plate in baseball and behind the goals in hockey. New Jersey follows a hybrid approach, patrons in the seating areas of a stadium are subject to the limited duty “Baseball Rule”, while those in other areas of the venue are protected by the business invitee rule, which provides that a landowner “owe[s] a duty of reasonable care to guard against any dangerous conditions on his or her property that the owner either knows about or should have discovered.” Maisonave v. Newark Bears Prof’l Baseball Club, Inc., 185 N.J. 70, 85 (2005) Where the operator of a stadium provides screened seats for the members of the public that desire such protection, and the protection fails, is the operator liable for the injuries that result? The answer is determined by the particular facts of the incident. A Florida jury may have to determine whether leaving the triangular gap described in Marc Topkin’s story for the Tampa Bay Times constituted a failure by the Rays to take reasonable care to protect their patrons. If this happened in New Jersey and you were a juror – what would you decide?
Contact CockerillCraigMoore Law
If you have a concern about your legal rights, remedies, and obligations contact the experienced lawyers of Craig Annin & Baxter, LLP.
FORMER CRAIGANNINBAXTERLAW PARTNER JUDGE FAUSTINO FERNANDEZ – VINA OF CAMDEN COUNTY CONFIRMED TO SERVE ON THE NJ SUPREME COURT
JUDGE FAUSTINO FERNANDEZ VINA OF CAMDEN COUNTY CONFIRMED TO SERVE ON THE NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT The CockerillCraigMooreLaw firm would like to congratulate the eminently qualified Judge Fernandez-Vina on being confirmed to serve on the New Jersey State Supreme Court....
NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT RULES MOTHER WITH TERMINAL BRAIN CANCER NOT UNFIT
COURT FINDS MOTHER WITH TERMINAL BREAST CANCER TO BE FIT PARENT In a ruling published in November, from an opinion handed down in May, 2013, judge Lawrence R. Jones, of the Ocean County Superior Court, held that a primary custodial parent diagnosed with Stage IV...
CHOOSING YOUR HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE – CHOICES TO MAKE AND COSTS TO BALANCE
If you have health insurance through an employer provided plan, union plan, retirement plan, or Medicare you may not need to make any adjustments in your health insurance coverage your coverage will remain in place although you may have new options and protections...
WILL YOUR HOMEOWNERS’ POLICY COVER YOU IN ANOTHER BIG STORM?
In the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy, you may be asking yourself whether your current homeowners’ insurance policy will provide protection in the event another big storm hits New Jersey, or what you need to do to ensure that you have the coverage you need. You want to...
LESSON FIVE – WHAT MAKES A GOOD WITNESS GOOD?
There is more to being a good witness than being on the “right” side of the case. For example: A good witness, TELLS THE TRUTH. A good witness lets the attorneys make the objections. A good witness makes sense to the jurors; the words, word pictures, phrases, sounds,...
FOR AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIPS – DO YOUR FORM DOCUMENTS COORDINATE WITH OR CONTRADICT EACH OTHER IN REGARD TO MANDATORY ARBITRATION PROVISIONS?
When a car dealership sells a vehicle, unless the transaction is paid for in full in cash at the time of delivery, a lease agreement or installment sales contract is executed simultaneously with the Retail Buyers Order. Arbitration clauses in a Retail Buyers Order are...
HEALTH PLANS AND PLAN PARTICIPANTS AFFECTED BY U.S. SUPREME COURT RULING
The U.S. Supreme Court handed down a decision in April, 2013, that reinforces the importance of expressly addressing the allocation of the costs of recovery for a third party injury suffered during the course of employment. In U.S. Airways, Inc. Employee Benefits Plan...
BACK TO SCHOOL MEANS YOUNG DRIVERS – AND THEIR PASSENGERS – AT RISK
As our children go back to school this year there will be new drivers driving to school for the first time, and many of their friends will celebrate being freed from taking the school bus to school. Yet most cars pulling into high school parking lots this fall will be...
THE NEED FOR ACCURATE RECORD KEEPING IN DIVORCE LITIGATION
The breakup of a marriage often has many difficult emotional and financial consequences. It is frequently a time of sadness, anger, uncertainty and even fear of the unknown. While many of those feelings are inevitable as long term relationships change, some of those...
LESSON THREE : DO YOUR INVESTIGATORS REALIZE THAT THEIR TESTIMONY STARTS WITH THE FIRST ENTRY THAT THEY MAKE IN THEIR INVESTIGATION FILE
LESSON THREE : DO YOUR INVESTIGATORS REALIZE THAT THEIR TESTIMONY STARTS WITH THE FIRST ENTRY, HANDWRITTEN OR ELECTRONIC, THAT THEY MAKE IN THEIR INVESTIGATION FILE OR EXCHANGE BY E-MAIL OR OTHER ELECTRONIC MESSAGE? Courtroom testimony begins long before the trial...